| Description: | Michael Primont (WSBA No. 20568, admitted 1991) of Seattle, was disbarred, effective June
 2, 2011, by order of the Washington State
 Supreme Court following approval of a stipulation.
 Mr. Primont affirmatively admitted that if
 the matter were to proceed to a public hearing,
 there is a substantial likelihood the Bar Association
 could prove by a clear preponderance
 of the evidence the facts and misconduct, but
 did not affirmatively admit to the facts and
 misconduct herein. This discipline is based
 on conduct involving immigration fraud. According
 to the Stipulated Facts:
 
 Since 2005, Ms. X has worked for Mr.
 Primont as a paralegal. Mr. Primont
 paid Ms. X $7,000 to marry Mr. W, an
 alien from China. On April 23, 2007, Ms.
 X and Mr. W were married in Las Vegas,
 Nevada. Mr. Primont was a witness to
 their marriage. Section 245(a) of the Immigration
 and Nationality Act prohibits
 an alien from seeking to procure a visa
 by fraud or willfully misrepresenting
 a material fact. On December 17,
 2007, Citizenship and lmmigration
 Services (CIS) officers conducted an
 unannounced visit to Ms. X’s residence
 in Kent, Washington. Ms. X admitted
 that her marriage to Mr. W was a sham,
 that the only purpose of the marriage
 was to aid Mr. W’s immigration case,
 and that Mr. Primont and Mr. W were in
 a relationship. On January 28, 2008, Ms.
 X filed for dissolution from Mr. W and
 the case concluded in May 2008. Ms. X
 withdrew her I-864 Affidavit of Support.
 In May 2008, Mr. Primont and Mr. W
 entered into a domestic partnership
 in Washington State. In July 2008, Mr.
 Primont married Mr. W in the State of
 California. In April 2009, Mr. W’s I-485
 application to register permanent
 residence or adjust status was denied
 by CIS on the basis of the fraudulent
 marriage. On November 18, 2010, the
 immigration judge accepted a prehearing
 stipulation and granted Mr.
 W voluntary departure to China in
 lieu of removal on or before December
 20, 2010.
 
 Mr. Primont’s conduct violated RPC 8.4(c),
 prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct
 involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
 
 Erica W. Temple represented the Bar Association.
 Kurt M. Bulmer represented Mr. Primont.
 |