Discipline Notice - Jeremiah S. Styles

License Number: 49543
Member Name: Jeremiah S. Styles
Discipline Detail
Action: Suspension
Effective Date: 6/11/2025
RPC: 1.16 - Declining or Terminating Representation
1.2 - Scope of Representation
1.3 - Diligence
1.4 - Communication
1.5 - Fees
3.2 - Expediting Litigation
3.3 - Candor Toward the Tribunal
5.1 - Responsibilities of a Partner or Supervisory Lawyer
5.1 - Responsibilities of a Partner or Supervisory Lawyer
5.3 - Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants
8.1 - Bar Admission Matters
8.4 (c) - Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation
8.4 (d) - Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
Discipline Notice: Order Approving Stipulation
Stipulation
Supreme Court Order
Description: Jeremiah Spencer Styles (WSBA No. 49543, admitted 2015) of Edmonds, WA, was suspended for three years, effective 6/11/2025, by order of the Washington Supreme Court. Henry Cruz acted as disciplinary counsel. Pedro Melesio and John C. Versnel III represented Respondent. Franz Laurent de Cannon was the hearing officer. Jeff Capell was the settlement hearing officer.

The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation), 1.2 (Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawy, 1.3 (Diligence), 1.4 (Communication), 1.5 (Fees), 3.2 (Expediting Litigation), 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal), 5.1 (Responsibilities of a Partner or Supervisory Lawyer), 5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants), 8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 8.4(c) (Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation) and 8.4(d) (Prejudicial to the Admin of Justice).

Styles stipulated to suspension for: (1) failing to appear at a hearing regarding an application for asylum in removal proceedings, failing to file a motion to change the venue of the clients’ removal proceedings, and/or failing to take other action to protect the clients’ interests; (2) failing to inform the clients of the status of their matter so that they could make arrangements to appear at their hearing; (3) making false statements to the immigration court in two clients’ matters; (4) making false statements to ODC during the grievance investigation; (5) failing to correct the errors in an asylum application and/or failing to review the clients’ asylum application prior to the individual hearing; (6) purporting to represent a client in an immigration matter without authority; (7) failing to timely file pleadings, failing to timely seek prosecutorial discretion, failing to timely initiate biometrics processing, failing to file a motion for administrative closure, failing to file required documents in the immigrant visa matter and/or failing to complete the immigrant visa matter, filing pleadings with erroneous information, submitting a deficient prosecutorial discretion request, submitting the biometrics initiation request at the wrong location, and/or failing to take other action to ensure a client’s removal and/or immigrant visa matter proceeded; (8) failing to inform a client of respondent’s failure to file the cancellation of removal application and/or request for voluntary departure, failing to promptly inform the client of the removal order and/or the motion to reconsider denial, and/or failing to promptly inform the client of the status of the immigrant visa matter; (9) collecting a fee for work that was of no benefit to the client and/or failing to refund unearned fees after the termination of representation; (10) failing to timely complete biometrics processing for clients in their asylum matter and/or failing to comply with the immigration court’s order; (11) failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that Styles Law had in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers at Styles Law conformed to the RPC, and/or failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that Dennaoui’s conduct conformed to the RPC, and (12) failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that Styles Law had in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the conduct of all nonlawyer staff at Styles Law was compatible with respondent’s professional obligations, and/or failing to make reasonable efforts to supervise nonlawyer staff member’s handling of a client matter to ensure that their conduct was compatible with respondent’s professional obligations.

Disciplinary Board Order Approving Stipulation; Stipulation to Suspension; and Washington Supreme Court Order.


In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents. Click the "Important Information" button below for further details.

Important Information +


This discipline search accesses notices of disciplinary action since 1984, and for cases decided in 2013 or later, also generally includes the official decision documents. The search does not contain pre-1984 notices or records, and may not contain the official decision documents in cases decided before 2013. To obtain other records of discipline, including pre-1984 discipline documents, please make a public records request.

The action listed on the discipline notice does not in all cases reflect the current status of the legal professional's license. Check the Legal Directory for current status information.